What we learned from the Livingston Growth Policy Survey

Results from the Growth Policy Survey were released Friday! With almost 1,200 responses, the survey helps provide information about some of the community’s priorities. 

The level of response shows just how much we care about planning for our future. This enthusiasm can help us create a growth policy that will allow local residents to guide Livingston’s growth.

Most of the questions were rated on a scale of 1-4. Any score of 3 or above means the survey respondents agree with that statement, or view the item as important.

You can read the entire survey online here. Here are some key takeaways:

Livingston residents care deeply about our natural resources.

The most popular measures throughout the entire survey related to conservation. 

The items with the highest rating all related to water: Enacting appropriate measures to protect ground water resources and the Yellowstone River, and protecting natural areas such as floodplains, wetlands and wildlife habitat.

In fact, every single question about natural resources policy was given a score of important or very important including everything from air pollution, reducing waste, reducing human-wildlife conflict and reducing risk from wildfire.

Residents believe more rental housing is needed

Almost 80 percent of respondents said the city has a shortage of rental housing and nearly 60 percent said there is a shortage of standard homes. Many added that the city also needs to have better regulations for short-term rentals.

Respondents said the shortage is making it difficult to recruit employees, and that rents are too high for the average worker.

Popular housing programs that were cited included: weatherization, mixed-use development being allowed and down payment assistance for first-time homebuyers.

Residents do not think there is adequate downtown planning.

The statement that the most respondents disagreed with was: “The city has adequate programs and planning for downtown development.”

This highlights the need for programs like Montana Main Street and a new Downtown Master Plan.

Residents also disagreed that there is adequate land available for new development. Citizens said there is not enough land for multifamily and single-family residences, or manufacturing and commercial developments. 

A rail crossing is needed, pedestrian-friendly improvements desired

Livingston residents overwhelmingly said a new separated grade crossing is needed on the west side of town. Respondents also said there should be improvements for people with disabilities and more pedestrian-friendly infrastructure. 

New development should help pay for infrastructure improvements, residents said. Policies should also promote energy efficiency and resilience. 

Thanks for all of your input. Remember you can always give feedback to the city online.